Which witch is which? The question may sound perplexing at first, but it is actually a common dilemma faced when dealing with witches. With their mysterious and elusive nature, it can be challenging to differentiate one witch from another. Witches have been a part of folklore and mythology for centuries. Across different cultures and traditions, witches have been depicted as powerful and often misunderstood individuals who possess magic abilities. While witches are often associated with brewing potions, casting spells, and riding broomsticks, there is much more to their identity than meets the eye. Interestingly, the term "witch" itself has evolved over time, taking on various meanings and connotations.
Lewis Allan had a long career and was credited on such famous songs as “The House I Live In"and "Strange Fruit”. It would be hard, however, to sum up Allan’s personal life, since he did not have one. Lewis Allan was a pseudonym created by an English teacher named Abel Meeropol. Left-leaning politically, Meeropol wrote songs that championed causes such as the rights of workers and the struggle against Franco in Spain. Often he brought humor to his criticisms of society, such as with his anti-appeasement tune “The Chamberlain Crawl,” which included the phrase: “Oh you start out in British style/ But you end up with a ‘Heil.’” “Riding the Broom” fits into Meeropol’s larger pattern of songs with a political message and a humorous bent, but the subject was ever more person because though he was not blacklisted, he was investigated by the Rapp-Coudert Committee (a committee questioning leftist tendencies among teachers) in 1940. He could have had even more of a motivation to write about this subject in 1947 because of mounting pressure on Communists in Hollywood at that time. Allan had just gotten recognition for Frank Sinatra’s rendition of “The House I Live In,” but hopes for a major career in films were cut short by suspicions about his political beliefs. The United States’ investigation of Communism also had implications for Meeropol’s personal life after he wrote “Riding the Broom,” since in the 1950s, he and his wife adopted Robert and Michael, the sons of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.
Miller watched former friends name names and wrote about the conflicting and dubious motivations of the judges, accusers, and the accused in the 17th century. The archival collections let us discover and match up lyrics with piano and piano-vocal scores, which we were able to date and annotate using the paper and electronic references resources, such as indexed newspaper and periodical data bases.
Interestingly, the term "witch" itself has evolved over time, taking on various meanings and connotations. In ancient times, witches were often considered healers, wise women, and practitioners of natural magic. However, with the rise of Christianity and the witch hunts of the Middle Ages, witches became vilified and associated with the devil.
WHICH WITCH IS WHICH?
Specific questions and elaborate illustrations complicate this hide-and-seek game, whose "witches" are animals in pointed hats. Every spread presents five queries opposite a detailed full-bleed image. For instance, "Which witch looks radiantly rich?" refers to six white rabbits having tea. All wear billowy gowns, but one drips with jewels. The answer may be evident, but more questions take the investigation further. "Is it the one feeling hot ?" (A sweaty rabbit fans herself.) "Is it the one stirring a pot ?" (A rabbit in a patched hat tends a teakettle.) "Is it the one eating an apricot ?" (The bejeweled rabbit nibbles an orange fruit.) Barrett, author of I Knew Two Who Said Moo , tirelessly repeats the title's formula on each new page, rhyming the homonyms "which witch" with "itch," "switch" and "glitch." Collicott's ( Toestomper and the Caterpillars ) appropriately weird gouaches feature look-alike groups, from polar bears to newts to chameleons, in creepy swamps or decadent interiors. Her near-identical witches wear patterned garments and make subtle movements; a lion palms a gold coin in "Which witch is a sneaky snitch?" The puzzles lose their luster as they are solved, but Barrett's numerous clues and Collicott's intricate visuals delay that inevitable fading. Ages 4-8. (Sept.)
DETAILS share BUY THIS BOOK close DetailsReviewed on: 09/10/2001
- Amazon
- Apple Books
- Barnes & Noble
- Bookshop
- IndieBound
More By and About this Authorchevron_right
Book Reviews THINGS THAT ARE MOST IN THE WORLD Judi Barrett"Nickle brushes on five-alarm acrylics to set the stage for Barrett's energetically loony look at superlatives," wrote PW. "The resulting Continue reading »
Never Take a Shark to the Dentist (and Other Things Not to Do) Judi BarrettBarrett (Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs ) and Nickle (The Ant Bully ) compile a set of droll rules to live by, each Continue reading »
The Marshmallow Incident Judi BarrettThe rival towns of Left and Right provide the fanciful medieval setting of this middling fable by the creators of Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs . Recalling Continue reading »
Pickles to Pittsburgh the Sequel to Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs: A Sequel to I Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
Judi BarrettNearly 20 years after the publication of Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs comes this droll sequel starring Kate and her brother Henry. This time, a postcard from their grandfather's peculiar Continue reading »
The Things That Are Most in the World Judi BarrettIn his debut children's book, Nickle brushes on five-alarm acrylics to set the stage for Barrett's (Pickles to Pittsburgh) energetically loony look at superlatives. Playing off such prize material as Continue reading »
Santa from Cincinnati Judi BarrettEveryone knows Santa lives at the North Pole, but readers may be surprised to discover that Santa was born and raised in Cincinnati. In this clever picture book memoir, Santa looks back at his early Continue reading »
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 3: Planet of the Pies Judi BarrettA full 35 years after Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (and 16 years after its sequel, Pickles to Pittsburgh), Barrett offers a third food-filled romp starring Kate, Henry, and Grandpa. Monés nicely Continue reading »
Lots More Animals Should Definitely Not Wear Clothing Judi BarrettThis husband-and-wife team follow up their classic picture book Animals Should Definitely Not Wear Clothing (1970) and its sequel, Animals Should Definitely Not Act like People (1980), with a look at Continue reading »
TOESTOMPER AND THE CATERPILLARS Sharleen CollicottPW called this story of a hard-hearted hellion who magically turns into a touchy-feely pushover "a cursory tale." Ages 4-8. Continue reading »
MILDRED AND SAM Sharleen CollicottCollicott's (Toestomper and the Caterpillars) cheery I Can Read Book introduces an endearing mouse couple living in a small hollow beneath a crop of Continue reading »
The Chicken Sisters Sharleen Collicott, Laura Joffe NumeroffPraising the ""humorous [and] intricately detailed"" art and the author's ""deadpan delivery,"" PW said this tale of three eccentric, highly domesticated hens offers ""off-the-wall fun."" Ages 3-7. Continue reading »
Toestomper and the Caterpillars Sharleen CollicottIn this cursory tale, a hard-hearted hellion magically turns into a touchy-feely pushover. Toestomper hails his pals, the Rowdy Ruffians, with a ""Hello, you lowlife rascals""; they share a mutual Continue reading »
The Teardrop Baby Karen Radler GreenfieldIn both text and art, a quality approximating Bosch for the younger set informs this seemingly straightforward book and adds sufficient subtleties to reward many readings. Collicott's illustrations, Continue reading »
The diversity of witches can also be seen in popular culture. From the wicked witches of fairy tales like the Wicked Witch of the West in "The Wizard of Oz" to the modern interpretation of witches in contemporary literature and television shows like "Harry Potter" and "Charmed," witches encompass a wide range of personalities, powers, and motivations. So, how do we distinguish between witches? One way is to consider their intentions and actions. Some witches may use their powers for good, seeking to help others and maintain balance in the natural world. These witches often adhere to a code of ethics and may be known as "white witches" or "good witches." On the other hand, there are witches who harness their powers for personal gain or harm others, often referred to as "dark witches" or "black witches." Additionally, witches may also differ in their knowledge and practices. Some witches specialize in specific branches of magic, such as herbalism, divination, or necromancy. Others may focus on a particular tradition or cultural background, incorporating elements of their heritage into their craft. These distinctions further contribute to the complexity of identifying which witch is which. It is important to remember that while witches may possess supernatural abilities, they are still individuals with their own stories, experiences, and identities. Each witch is unique, with her own set of skills, beliefs, and motivations. Understanding and respecting these differences is crucial in dispelling misconceptions and stereotypes surrounding witches. In the end, the answer to "which witch is which" lies in understanding and appreciating the diversity and complexity of witches. By recognizing and embracing the multiplicity of witch identities, we can move beyond the narrow stereotypes and appreciate the rich tapestry of witchcraft throughout history and in contemporary society..
Reviews for "The Witch's Wardrobe: Warding Off Evil with Different Types of Protection Charms"
1. Sarah - 2/5 stars - I really didn't enjoy "Which witch is which". The plot was confusing and hard to follow, with too many characters and storylines. I found myself constantly flipping back to previous chapters to try and make sense of it all. The writing felt rushed and lacked depth, making it difficult to connect with any of the characters. Overall, I was left disappointed and frustrated after reading this book.
2. Mark - 1/5 stars - "Which witch is which" was a complete waste of time for me. The premise seemed interesting, but the execution fell flat. The writing was overly simplistic and lacked any real substance. The characters were one-dimensional and uninteresting, making it hard to care about their fates. The humor also fell short, with forced and predictable jokes. I would not recommend this book to anyone looking for a captivating and well-written story.
3. Emily - 2/5 stars - I had high hopes for "Which witch is which", but it left me disappointed. The plot was scattered and lacked coherence, jumping from one event to another with no clear direction. The dialogue was cringe-worthy, with awkward and forced conversations. Additionally, the ending was incredibly unsatisfying and felt rushed. Overall, I found this book to be a letdown and would not recommend it to others.
4. John - 2/5 stars - "Which witch is which" was a confusing and frustrating read. The story felt disjointed and the characters were underdeveloped. I struggled to connect with any of them and found their motivations to be unclear. The pacing was also off, with overly long and dull scenes followed by rushed and chaotic ones. The book had potential, but it was ultimately a letdown.