Create your own magical creatures with our water toy kit

By admin

The magic water toy creation kit is a fun and engaging toy that allows children to create their own water-based toys. This kit typically includes various components such as molds, colors, and accessories that children can use to design and customize their toys. The main feature of this kit is a special material that, when mixed with water, forms a gel-like substance that can be molded into different shapes. This material is usually safe and non-toxic, making it suitable for children to play with. To create their own water toys, children simply need to mix the special material with water and pour it into the molds provided in the kit. They can then add colors or decorative elements to personalize their creations.



The Tiger and Tiger Club Mascot Tradition

In 2011-2012, Tiger fans will see Chris Alston, a junior Computer Engineering major from Atlanta, Ga and Christopher “Kit” Southwick, a senior Sports marketing major from St. Albans, VT share duties as “The Tiger” and Sarah Newburn, a senior Special Education major from Greenville, SC in her third year as “The Tiger Cub” mascot. Assisting Sarah is Marshall Saunders, a senior Ag Mechanization & Business major from Piney River, VA.

Since 1954, a Clemson student has adorned the mascot suit to entertain the Clemson faithful. Joined in 1993 by The Tiger Cub, these furry creatures can be seen imitating game officials (which is now against the rules), signing autographs, getting their picture taken with dignitaries (President Reagan, President Bush, Olympic athletes, among others), shooting the cannon, or doing “Pushups” each time Clemson scores.

Two of the fan favorite mascots were the all-time pushup leader (2,216) Mike Bays (’94-’97) who was third in the 1996 UCA National Mascot Championships and Chris Peters (’92-’93) who spent the 1995 football season as the mascot of the Memphis Mad Dogs of the World Football League. The “Eye of the Tiger” will always shine bright for the Clemson mascot due to an endowment set-up by Stuart McWhorter (’88-89) and his father Clayton in 1995.

Here are just a few of the great experiences by the Clemson mascots: One of McWhorter’s funniest moments was in Columbia in 1989 when he grabbed a tuba from a member of Tiger Band during halftime of the USC game. He ran on the field and created general havoc until being chased away by an offended Carolina band member.

Said Jay Williams, “It was an honor to be the first Tiger Cub.” “It was exciting create a personality and seeing the kids faces. The Tiger is more traditional, the fighting Tiger, but I am innocent, playful childlike mascot that the smaller kids really enjoy. The Cub adds a new dimension and means of interacting with the crowd.”

All-Time Pushup Records
Category Record/Record Holder Opponent Year
First Quarter 62 by Jon Potter Duke 2001
Second Quarter 175 by Ricky Capps Wake Forest 1981
Third Quarter 225 by Christopher “Kit” Southwick North Carolina 2011
Fourth Quarter 128 by Rob Lockard N.C. State 1998
Single Game 465 by Ricky Capps Wake Forest 1981
Away Day Game 251 by Zack Mills Wake Forest 1978
Away Night Game 315 by Brad Stoehr South Carolina 2003
Home Day Game 465 by Ricky Capps Wake Forest 1981
Home Night Game 135 by Jon Potter The Citadel 2000
Overseas Game 72 by Randy Faile Wake Forest 1982
Bowl Game 105 by Martin Lowry Penn State 1988
Season 1,549 by Jon Potter 2000
Career 2,216 by Mike Bays 1994-97

Schedule an Appearance by The Tiger or Tiger Cub

To request an appearance up to 90 minutes by The Tiger or Tiger Cub, please forward a letter or an e-mail to:

John Seketa Clemson Athletics P.O. Box 31 Clemson, SC 29633

The letter must contain the following information; name of the event, date, time, location, directions, contact person and phone number.

The cost for an appearance is $70.00 and $.50 per mile to and from the location. You will receive in writing a confirmation on whether or not a mascot will be able to make the appearance.

The Tiger Year Tiger Cub
Chris Alston & Kit Southwick 2011-12 Sarah Newburn
Michael Speer 2010-11 Sarah Newburn
Nolan Cole 2009-10 Sarah Newburn
Nolan Cole 2008-09 Martin Jernigan
Dan Licata 2007-08 Tyler Alewine
Brandon Little 2006-07 Clint Cagle
Brandon Little 2005-06 Clint Cagle
Brad Stoehr 2004-05 Paul Huguley
Brad Stoehr 2003-04 Paul Huguley
Patrick Hitpas 2002-03 Jordan Powell
Patrick Hitpas 2001-02 Kate Weppner
Jon Potter 2000-01 Dan Wangerin
Zack Callaham 1999-2000 Dan Wangerin
Rob Lockard 1998-99 Dan Wangerin
Wes Scruggs 1997-98 Ryan Teten
Mike Bays 1996-97 Ryan Teten
Mike Bays 1995-96 Brian Gerhart
Mike Bays 1994-95 Jay Williams
Chase Nichols 1993-94 Jay Williams
Chris Peters 1992-93
Will Sykes 1991-92
Will Sykes 1990-91
Stuart McWhorter 1989-90
Martin Lowry & Stuart McWhorter 1988-89
Martin Lowry 1987-88
Chris Shimakonis 1986-87
David Friedman 1985-86
Jay Watson 1984-85
Randy Faile 1983-84
Randy Faile 1982-83
Ricky Capps 1981-82
Ricky Capps 1980-81
Zack Mills 1979-80
Zack Mills 1978-79
Chris Carter 1977-78
Randy Addison 1976-77
George Langstaff (Football) 1975-76
David Baird (Basketball) 1975-76
Tony Saad 1974-75
Michael Hunt 1973-74
Michael Hunt 1972-73
Randy Jackson 1971-72
Randy Jackson 1970-71
Sam Coker 1969-70
Sam Coker 1968-69
Bob Harris 1967-68
Zeke Welborn 1966-67
Dr. Marvin Reid 1965-66
1964-65
Jim Gibson 1963-64
1962-63
Jim Lloyd 1961-62
Steve Morrison 1960-61
Billy McCown 1959-60
1958-59
Tommy Grant 1957-58
1956-57
1955-56
Gabby Hayes 1954-55
Measurement The Tiger Tiger Cub
Neck 16″ 15″
Sleeve 35″ 34″
Height 6’1″ 5’6″
Hips 42″ 42″
Waist 36″ 34″
Inseam 34″ 34″
Head/Hat Size Large 11 7/8
Tail 56″ 48″
Shoe Size NA 28

The fur fabric is 80% acrylic and 20% polyester with a backing that is 75% polyester and 25% cotton. Heads are constructed from Kydex plastic.

Clemson finally changing their mascot?

The Clemson Tiger has been roaring since 1896. That’s almost 127 years of that unbearably bright- and eye-straining orange that consumes the entire campus.
It’s time for students to rally for change. It’s time to retire the tiger and put away the orange paint once and for all.
First of all, there are much cooler animals out there than a tiger.
Starfish have the ability to regenerate their own limbs. Not to mention, they don’t require silly necessities that could hold them back, like blood and a brain. Starfish can also live up to 35 years in the wild, unlike tigers which typically only survive for about 15 years.
Chameleons can blend into their environment, change colors and even have projectile tongues to catch their prey which is super cool and interesting.
Not roosters, though. That would be a weird and boring animal to have as a mascot.
Ligers have an incredible stripe pattern that is both beautiful and functional for blending into their environments, unlike a tiger which has a completely different appearance.
Zebras are my favorite animal, so that’s another animal to consider.
Second of all, tigers are scary. Think of all the children who are probably scarred for life from seeing that big tiger with pointy teeth every time they attend a football game.
“I’m tired of this suit,” Clemson’s Tiger mascot said. “I’m also tired of scaring innocent kids.”
We should consider a much more PG- and kid-friendly mascot that won’t leave children with nightmares.
Now, as for the current color scheme of the University, there are definitely changes to be made there.
Orange is just not a very flattering color. It’s really hard to put an outfit together when I want to support my school, and that shouldn’t be the case.
Clemson should consider other cooler and more appealing colors to go with their new mascot.
I think it would be a nice change for Clemson to move more toward a cool-color scheme. Maybe a nice blue or a mint green. Purple should definitely be thrown in there somewhere, though, because that’s my favorite color.
However, this new color scheme should avoid colors such as red, black and white. These colors are boring and tend to represent schools that lose to Clemson often. We wouldn’t want to step on their toes.
In addition to this new mascot and color scheme, it will also be necessary that Clemson chooses a new logo to represent the school that isn’t a paw print.
This, of course, depends on the new animal chosen to represent the University. Still, Clemson may want to consider thinking outside of the box for this. For example, two paw prints would be a really different and creative logo for Clemson to consider.
So, let’s get started and make these changes happen.
Clemson University is an amazing school with so many great things to offer. Just imagine how much better it will be once these changes are made. I’m sure everyone agrees.

3 differences between Clemson and LSU's mascot

Dec 28, 2019; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; LSU Tigers mascot Mike the Tiger performs during the third quarter of the 2019 Peach Bowl college football playoff semifinal game against the Oklahoma Sooners. Mandatory Credit: Brett Davis-USA TODAY Sports

January 8, 2020 10:52 am CT

Both teams claim play in the real Death Valley. Both teams consider “Tiger Rag” to be their fight song. But one of the most obvious similarities between the Clemson Tigers and the LSU Tigers is that they share the same animal as a mascot. Except they’re slightly different. Here’s a look at three things that set the two Tigers apart.

They can then add colors or decorative elements to personalize their creations. After a short period of time, the material solidifies and the toys can be removed from the molds. One of the key benefits of this toy is its versatility.

1. LSU has a live mascot, Clemson doesn’t.

LSU has a live tiger living on campus, while Clemson only has a costumed version. The school’s first-ever live mascot was Mike I, who lived from 1936 to 1956. LSU has had six Tigers since that one, with Mike VII who was introduced in 2017 currently residing in the habitat near Tiger Stadium. Traditionally, the mascot is a Bengal tiger, though Mike V was a Bengal-Indochinese mix, Mike VI was a Bengal-Siberian hybrid, and Mike VII is also a Bengal–Siberian mix. Controversy has surrounded the keeping of a wild animal as a mascot in captivity for years, and LSU stopped taking Mike to home football games in 2016 after the death of Mike VI.

Magic watef toy creation kit

Children can create a wide range of toys using the kit, from small figurines to larger objects. The kit often includes molds in different shapes and sizes, allowing children to experiment and unleash their creativity. Another advantage of the magic water toy creation kit is that it encourages imaginative play. Not only can children design and construct their own toys, but they can also use them in various play scenarios. The gel-like material used in the kit can be manipulated and shaped, providing a sensory experience for children as they engage in imaginative play. Furthermore, this toy is also educational. It helps children develop fine motor skills as they manipulate and mold the material. Additionally, the process of mixing colors and creating different shapes can also foster creativity and artistic abilities in children. Overall, the magic water toy creation kit is a delightful and educational toy that provides children with an opportunity to create their own water-based toys. By combining imaginative play, creativity, and fine motor skill development, this toy offers a fun and engaging experience for children..

Reviews for "Spark your child's creativity with our magical water toy kit"

1. Sarah - 1/5
I was extremely disappointed with the Magic Water Toy Creation Kit. The instructions were unclear and confusing, making it nearly impossible to create anything remotely recognizable. The materials provided were also of poor quality and didn't work as described. The water didn't magically transform into the desired shapes and the colors were dull and faded. Overall, I would not recommend this product to anyone looking for a fun and creative toy.
2. Mark - 2/5
I had high hopes for the Magic Water Toy Creation Kit, but unfortunately, it fell short of my expectations. The concept seemed interesting, but the execution was poor. The molds were flimsy and easily broke, making it difficult to create anything. Additionally, the colors didn't mix well and the finished creations didn't retain their shape once they dried. It was a frustrating experience and not worth the price. I would suggest looking for alternative toys that offer a better creative experience.
3. Emily - 2/5
I found the Magic Water Toy Creation Kit to be quite underwhelming. The colors included were not vibrant and they didn't mix well together. The final creations looked dull and unimpressive. The molds were also quite small and limited in terms of design options. The instructions provided were confusing, and it took me several attempts to understand how to use the kit properly. Overall, I was not satisfied with the quality and results of this toy kit.

Make bath time magical with our water toy creation kit

Have endless fun with our water toy creation kit