The smelting witch in the Wizard of Oz is an intriguing character that plays a pivotal role in the story. The idea of smelting, which refers to the process of melting and purifying metal, is a unique concept to associate with a witch. In the context of the Wizard of Oz, the smelting witch is responsible for overseeing the melting and destruction of the Wicked Witch of the West. The main idea here is that the smelting witch acts as the catalyst for the downfall of the Wicked Witch of the West. In the narrative, Dorothy accidentally throws a bucket of water on the Wicked Witch during their encounter. Water is known to be the Wicked Witch's weakness, causing her to melt away.
Learning Day: The Cursed Lore of Southpaw 🌭
Hi! I’d like to introduce you to “Southpaw.” He is the mascot of the Chicago White Sox.
He is also a gateway to 125+ years of cursed lore.
A little housekeeping up top: I like Southpaw just fine. He is green and besnouted and joyful. The lady inside the suit seems nice. Also I mean it both ways when I say I like Southpaw just fine. He’s unmemorable. He’s derivative. He’s not a pioneering weird mascot (San Diego Chicken, 1974) or avant garde mascot (Phillie Phanatic, 1978) or ironic “anti-mascot” (San Francisco Giants “Crazy Crab”, 1984). Southpaw premiered in 2004, long after the era of mainstream mascot innovation. He also premiered before the era of proletarian mascot revolution (Philadelphia Flyers “Gritty”, 2018) and dystopian mascot annihilation (see below).
Southpaw lacks those ambitions/ammunitions. He is here to make a few kids happy. That’s all most mascots want…I hope. I did google “yiffing” once, because somebody said that word around me once and I’m compelled to understand all things. Why did I look into it? Because I love discovering why things are, to pull a random phrase, “secretly incredibly fascinating.” Anyway I’ve now grokked “yiff”. And I don’t know every mascot’s heart. But Southpaw seems like he’s on the “Muppets (Tame Division)” end of the Sexual Fabric-Being spectrum.
And for most people, that’s all there is to Southpaw. They think that set of thoughts about him (that ENTIRE EXACT set of thoughts about him) and move on. But if you’re me, you self-impose a quest of pointless discovery. You learn Southpaw is a doorway into these four astounding tales of accursed baseball mascots.
I’m a lifelong Chicago White Sox fan. When I lived in the region, I went to games in person. And when Southpaw came onto the scene, he gently gaslit every adult I knew. Here’s why: the Chicago White Sox began existing in 1901. People got used to a certain White Sox routine over that century. 2004 was also a much different media time from today. Newspapers and television had bigger, Bush-ier fish to fry. “The Facebook” was Ivy Co-eds Exclusive. Phone camera resolution was on the “Grainy Bigfoot Photo” step of the tech tree.
So most adults I knew weren’t forewarned about the White Sox marketing department’s new schemes. They got no warning. A sudden green weirdo up and Kool Aid Man’d their ball games. And they grappled with questions: Who was this mascot? Why was this mascot? And most terrifying: had this mascot always been there? Like in that famous psychology experiment where subjects watched a video where a gorilla walks through the frame and most subjects missed the gorilla? Grown White Sox fans wondered that. They wondered if green mascots were always there, throughout their lives, surrounding them like endless fuzzy ‘The Matrix’ code.
By the way, I handled this fine. In 2004, I was a child. I felt barraged with new characters/experiences/Iraq Wars every day. But for adults discovering him, Southpaw sparked at least a few questions about memory and reality. Which rules. Because – in case anyone forgot – Southpaw is a mascot. A trifle. A sports clown.
Speaking of sports clowns, do you wonder why Southpaw could become the White Sox mascot? Why was the gig open? Why wasn’t there a fuzzy incumbent? Admittedly, there’s one good reason you might not have wondered this. You might know many baseball teams lack mascots, for old-fashioned crust-assedness reasons. Pre-20th century America lacked a fursona industrial complex, and that’s when many baseball teams began.
But the 20th century White Sox’s asses were the most crust-free. They strapped their scoreboard full of fireworks. They created the most radical Sports Illustrated cover of all time. They even tried wearing shorts (a HUGE baseball no-no, and an impossible garment if one’s ass is becrusted). The White Sox tried to be more fun than every other team in the league. Naturally, they attracted a team mascot. In fact, they attracted… [ominous voice] …too many team mascots. [ominous ballpark pipe organ]
From their beginnings to the 1970s, the White Sox had no official mascot. And nature abhors a mascot vacuum. So a kind fan named “Andy The Clown” started showing up to games, dressed as a clown, to bring children joy for free. SouthSideSox.com documents what happened next: ballpark ticket takers let Andy The Clown enter without paying. Andy’s legend grew.
At one game, Andy sat in the Mayor Of Chicago’s lap, as a joke – a joke I also assume made him Temporary Super Mayor. And then in 1980 (Peak Andy), White Sox team ownership launched a multi-front war against him. They ordered ballpark staff to start charging Andy for game tickets. And they introduced two official mascots, specifically to supersede Andy. Their chosen fuzz-thugs were “Ribbie” and “Roobarb”, a pair of Phillie Phanatic Phnock-offs.
Between the cruelty to Andy, and the Pinkerton-icity of Ribbie and Roobarb, the fanbase revolted. Fans protested. And this was an era when you could only contact someone by calling their corded phone, writing them a letter, or running into them at your local music-burning rally. Despite those Stone Age communication limitations, White Sox fans ran a protest on behalf of a gentle clown. The team buckled. The team temporarily let Andy back in. Then they reneged in 1991. Andy opted to purchase tickets, and continue clowning at his own expense, until 1995…when he died. Fans also never liked Ribbie and Roobarb, regardless of their motivations. They hounded & harassed those two until the team junked them in 1988. And remember: this entire conflict happened in the field of sports mascoting. There was a fans versus team, David versus Goliath power struggle to determine who waved at children from out-of-bounds. And the winner…was death.
This story is quick. Also not a White Sox story. But it’s another “W” for the reaper.
The New York Yankees lack a mascot. That’s partly due to crust-ass-itude. (See also: the Yankees’ love of force-shaving grown men.) Here is the main reason the New York Yankees lack a mascot: they tried one, named “Dandy”. And it became the biggest tragedy in mascot history.
Dandy was an initial hit, mostly because he resembled Yankees star Thurman Munson (see human above). Then, within months of Dandy’s introduction, Munson died in a plane crash. The team tried to keep Dandy going, but Dandy reminded everyone of that tragic dead guy too much. It turns out a fun sports mascot can feel like the Austrian horror film Goodnight Mommy. And that’s not the only way it can all fall apart…
…because in a more fundamental sense, a team’s mascot is its name. Names are a risk. Names change meanings! You can be minding your own business, in 1890, naming your team “the Cincinnati Reds”. And then boom: international communism happens. By 1953 you’re changing names to “the Redlegs”, even though it makes your players sound like they need Group Ointment Therapy.
Most teams do a direct 1:1 name-to-mascot. The Eagles put a guy in an eagle costume. The Bulldogs put a guy in a bulldog costume. Also the Yale University sports teams are fancy (duh) and breed real bulldogs (cute) as their puppy mascots (yikes child labor much?), complete with king-style Roman numeral’d names (a constitutional dogarchy).
So how did the White Sox get their name? In 1901, so many good animals were not taken yet! Also, a sock cannot be a mascot. Oh sure, it can be a wrestling sidekick slash caregiver. It can be a television host… in Canada. But the “White Sox” name isn’t sparked by wanting to put a guy in a sock outfit. Instead, it’s at least partly sparked by a turn-of-the-century death scare.
Colorful socks became popular uniform gear in the late 1860s. Cleats became popular baseball gear too. Baseball cleats have metal spikes. A sliding runner can stab a defender’s legs. And in the 1900s/1910s, a false medical concern started going around the league. People worried sock dye could get into a cleat wound, and cause an infection, and kill the player. No players died of this false belief. But people panicked anyway. As a result, “sanitary” white socks became popular league-wide. The White Sox uniforms emphasized theirs. And because of that celebration of a solution to a fake problem, the team lacks an easy-to-mascotify name.
Which brings us to today. Southpaw is the shrug at the end of more than a century of wondering what cartoon character best represents placebo safety laundry. And honestly? That makes him more fun to me. I’m actually finally interested in Southpaw now. Because while others dismiss him on websites like Reddit.com:
…you and I are here, on the best website, knowing Southpaw is [the title of Alex’s podcast].
- Tags Alex Schmidt, Free, Sports
The Weird Curse Of Rowdy, The Dallas Cowboys Mascot
So why haven't the Cowboys been able to win another one since? Could they be cursed. by one of their own?
Remember that list I shared the other day about NFL mascots? Rowdy, the mascot for the Dallas Cowboys, recently topped a list from BetTexas.com that ranked the most loved NFL mascots. Nearly 60-percent of all Twitter posts over the course of a year were positive.
But in researching Rowdy. something else came up. The big smiling cowboy was introduced as Dallas' mascot in 1996. just months after the Cowboys won the Super Bowl.
And now here we are in 2022 and the Cowboys haven't won a Super Bowl since. Heck, they haven't even been to a Super Bowl since winning it all in 1995.
Coincidence? I think not.
Maybe Rowdy's curse is what's behind Dez Bryant's catch. non-catch against the Green Bay Packers in the 2014 NFC Divisional Game. And Rowdy could definitely be behind Tony Romo's botched hold on a chip shot field goal in a 2006 Wild Card game at Seattle.
Sure. it's unlikely a mascot with a large, smiling head donning a cowboy hat has anything to do with the Super Bowl drought, but it does make you wonder.
And it turns out I'm not the only one to make the connection. Check out this story done by a local TV station in 2017 when the Cowboys were just 60 minutes away from breaking the "curse" and getting back to the NFC Championship Game.
Spoiler Alert: they lost and the drought, or curse(?), continues.
America's Favorite Mascot : The History of the Army Mule at West Point
America's Favorite Mascot chronicles the history of the U.S. Army mules at West Point. West Point has a rich history that has impacted United States History and the United States Military immensely. Alongside the esteemed graduates of West Point have been their beloved mules. America's Favorite Mascot tells the stories of the mules, their antics, and the important role they have played at the United States Military Academy.
"America's Favorite Mascot does an excellent job telling the story of America's favorite mascot! The Army mules have been essential to the success of our armed forces since the birth of this nation and the West Point mules are an important part of West Point history. This is a must read for any West Point fan or history buff!" -- Alfred Hoffman, Jr. US Ambassador, USMA ’56, Hannibal, my mule boss’53-‘56
"The long gray mule line is an important part of the long gray line and America's Favorite Mascot does a great job introducing the public to an important part of West Point history." -- Harrison Mann, USMA '12
"Mules are an important part of the armed forces and especially West Point, and America's Favorite Mascot truly shows us just how amazing they are. A great read for any military history enthusiast! And I hope USMA graduates everywhere will add it to their West Point memorabilia collections." -- Steve Townes, CEO, Ranger Aerospace, USMA '75 (Head Rabble Rouser and Mule Rider).
“Tiny Tomsen told me many times that the mission is to celebrate the rich legacy of the West Point Mule. This wonderful book suggests ‘mission accomplished’. Tiny would be proud”. -- Mike Lapolla, USMA '65
Water is known to be the Wicked Witch's weakness, causing her to melt away. This sets the stage for the smelting witch to complete the final act of destruction. Symbolically, the smelting witch represents the forces of justice and retribution in the story.
The Wicked Witch of the West represents evil and tyranny, and her defeat by the smelting witch is a satisfying resolution for the audience. It signifies the triumph of good over evil and the restoration of balance in the magical land of Oz. Furthermore, the use of the term "smelting" adds a layer of complexity to the character of the witch. Smelting is often associated with heat and fire, which are elements typically attributed to witches in popular culture. The choice to present the smelting witch as a powerful figure capable of overseeing the destruction of the Wicked Witch emphasizes her authority and strength. In conclusion, the smelting witch in the Wizard of Oz is a significant character that represents justice and retribution. The act of smelting the Wicked Witch of the West highlights the triumph of good over evil and the restoration of harmony in the story. The use of the term "smelting" adds depth and complexity to the character, presenting her as a powerful figure capable of overseeing the destruction of an iconic antagonist..
Reviews for "The Witch's Toolkit: Understanding the Smelting Process in the Wizard of Oz"
1. Jane - 1 star - I have to say, "Smelting witch wizard of oz" was one of the worst shows I have ever seen. The acting was subpar, the costumes were cheap, and the storyline made absolutely no sense. I couldn't wait for it to be over. Save your money and skip this one.
2. Michael - 2 stars - I was really excited to see "Smelting witch wizard of oz" but was ultimately disappointed. The set design was lackluster, and the special effects were laughable. The actors seemed bored and uninterested, which made it hard for me to care about the story. Overall, it was a forgettable production.
3. Sarah - 1 star - I had high hopes for "Smelting witch wizard of oz" but was let down by the lack of creativity and originality. It felt like a cheap knock-off of the original Wizard of Oz story with no unique elements to make it stand out. The songs were forgettable, and the choreography was sloppy. I would not recommend wasting your time on this production.