Unclad Witch Scheme: The Intersection of Tradition and Empowerment

The "Unclad Witch Scheme" is a term that refers to a fraudulent investment scheme that typically targets unsuspecting individuals with promises of high returns on their investments. This scheme is often characterized by a lack of transparency and the use of manipulative tactics to lure in victims. In the "Unclad Witch Scheme," individuals are often approached by someone claiming to have insider knowledge or access to a secret investment opportunity. They may use persuasive techniques, such as flattery or urgency, to convince their victims to invest their money. Once the victims have invested their money, they often find that the promised returns never materialize. In some cases, the perpetrators may even disappear, leaving the victims with little to no recourse to recover their lost funds.

This is called Waterline. It is by Oliver Barratt and dates from 2006

But at least Catford Shopping centre is still standing unlike a number of Luder s other well known projects, such as the Tricorn Centre in Portsmouth, Trinity Square Gateshead and the Southgate shopping centre in Bath. According to Wikipedia She studied dance as a child and after the First World War began performing in theatre and cabaret, where she established her career over the following decade.

In some cases, the perpetrators may even disappear, leaving the victims with little to no recourse to recover their lost funds. The term "Unclad Witch Scheme" is derived from the idea that the perpetrators of this scheme are like witches, who use their cunning and deceitful tactics to take advantage of innocent victims. The term "unclad" refers to the lack of transparency and honesty in the scheme, as the perpetrators often conceal their true intentions and manipulate their victims.

Unclad witch scheme

Sep 29 2011, 11:29am

1. At first, did Sauron capture both east and west Osgiliath?
Beregond in Minas Tirith, LotR says,

And the Fell Riders, less than a year ago they won back the crossings, . Boromir it was that drove the enemy at last back from this western shore,

sudden war came upon us out of Mordor, and we were swept away. . Only a remnant of our eastern force came back, destroying the last bridge that still stood amid the ruins of Osgiliath.

Does this mean that after Sauron took Osgiliath, Boromir led a force to recapture Osgiliath, drove the enemy back to the eastern shore, broke the bridge and swam back? But then why say "our eastern force"? It seems to imply that only east Osgiliath was taken and they retreated to west Osgiliath.

2. How and when did the Nazg�l cross the Anduin?
Did they use the bridge?
I don't know how "canon" Unfinished Tales is, but anyway,
The Hunt for the Ring, UT, version (i) says,

the Lord of Morgul was sent forth openly to battle against Gondor. Therefore when Osgiliath was taken and the bridge broken Sauron stayed the assault, and the Nazg�l were ordered to begin the search for the Ring. The Lord of Morgul therefore led his companions over Anduin, unclad and unmounted, and invisible to eyes. It was, maybe, on the first day of July that they went forth.

In the panic of the first assault, when the Witch-king was allowed to reveal himself briefly in his full terror, the Nazg�l crossed the bridge at night and dispersed northwards. Boromir and Faramir were able to drive back the enemy and destroy the bridge, only because the attack had now served its main purpose.

So.
In version (i), it is after the bridge is broken, or after Sauron stayed his assault, and the Nazg�l crossed or floated(however they did it) over the Anduin on July 1st.
In version (ii), the Nazg�l crossed "the bridge" at the beginning, and later Boromir and Faramir retook west Osgiliath.
Which is more "canon"? Or are parts of both acceptable?

3. When did they break the bridge? How long did the battle last for?
Sauron attacks, they are swept away. Boromir regroups and attacks Osgiliath, breaks the bridge. I'm guessing a week?

4. Who broke the bridge?
Boromir says,

I was in the company that held the bridge, until it was cast down behind us. Four only were saved by swimming: my brother and myself and two others.

I take it that one of his officers did it, most likely planned, judging from the references. But it sounds like a suicide mission, since only four people survived.

Sep 29 2011, 1:15pm

My guess is Sauron held the bridge long enough for the Nazgul to use it. They had a foothold on the western shore, which facilitated their passage into Gondor/Rohan.

Boromir rallied the troops, retook the bridge and western shore, and destroyed the bridge (which you usually have to do in person without modern explosives). Then he and the bridge-destroying survivors swam back. I would tend to discount his talk at the Council of Elrond as a literal description because he's omitting a lot of details to be concise.

Oct 2 2011, 4:27am

This ties into your third and fourth questions. I would surmise that the battle lasted only a couple or three days at most (it's a rare battle that lasts longer) and that the breaking of the bridge was the conclusion of the fight. Sauron seems not to have sent troops enough or of the right kinds to force a difficult river crossing in the face of determined resistance. I imagine that the decision to destroy the bridge was made by Boromir and Faramir as the captains commanding the defence, but because they intended to hold the line while it was done, the actual destruction was delegated to others.

Oct 2 2011, 6:50am

The weekly discussion of The Lord of the Rings is back. Join us in the Reading Room for Homeward Bound!

Oct 2 2011, 2:13pm

Faramir himself said that the Men of Minas Tirith seldom boast while Boromir assures the Fellowship that they do not lie- so Boromir's account is likely to be the most accurate. Since Boromir was considered a hero and idol, the stories can inflate or deflate in embelishment depending on teller; who knows what Ioreth might have said!

Oct 3 2011, 11:01am

They passed slowly and in stealth, through An�rien, and over the Entwade, and so into the Wold, and rumour of darkness and a dread of men knew not what went before them. They reached the west-shores of Anduin a little north of Sarn Gebir, as they had trysted; and there received horses and raiment that were secretly ferried over the River. This was (it is thought) about the seventeeth of July. Then they passed northward seeking for the Shire, the land of the Halflings.

The new member needs to really consider this because it can be a huge issue and the new member must come to terms with where they stand. At least until they can work it out for themselves or with a therapist. It could be body issues and with a little gentle trust building, you may get their clothes off. But if they have experienced some trauma, they will need a lot more than getting over some insignificant body issues.

It is important for individuals to be aware of the signs and red flags associated with the "Unclad Witch Scheme" in order to protect themselves from becoming victims. These may include promises of unusually high returns on investment, pressure to invest quickly without proper due diligence, and a lack of documentation or transparency regarding the investment opportunity. To avoid falling victim to this scheme, individuals should always conduct thorough research and due diligence before investing their money. They should also be cautious of anyone who promises guaranteed returns or uses high-pressure sales tactics. Additionally, it is important to seek advice from reputable financial professionals or consult with trusted friends and family members before making any investment decisions. Overall, the "Unclad Witch Scheme" serves as a reminder of the importance of critically evaluating investment opportunities and exercising caution when dealing with individuals who make extravagant promises. By being vigilant and informed, individuals can protect themselves from falling victim to fraudulent schemes and preserve their hard-earned money..

Reviews for "The Unclad Witch Scheme: Reviving Ancient Traditions in Modern Halloween Celebrations"

1. Karen - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with "Unclad witch scheme". The storyline was weak and didn't make much sense. The characters were unlikable and lacked depth. The humor fell flat and seemed forced. Overall, it was a forgettable and underwhelming experience.

2. Michael - 1 star - "Unclad witch scheme" was an absolute mess. The acting was terrible and the dialogue was cringe-worthy. The special effects were laughable and took away from any potential enjoyment. I found myself bored and uninterested throughout the entire film. Save yourself the time and skip this one.

3. Jessica - 2 stars - I had high hopes for "Unclad witch scheme" but it failed to live up to expectations. The pacing was off, with long stretches of boredom followed by rushed and confusing plot developments. The cinematography was lackluster and the editing felt sloppy. I wouldn't recommend wasting your time on this film.

The Unclad Witch Scheme: Embodying the Strength and Power of Witches