The curse of Sleeping Beauty is a fantasy thriller film released in 2016. Directed by Pearry Reginald Teo, the movie serves as a dark adaptation of the classic fairy tale, Sleeping Beauty. The story revolves around Thomas Kaiser, a young man who inherits an old mansion from his estranged uncle. Little does Thomas know that the mansion holds a dark secret tied to an ancient curse. The curse causes anyone who sleeps within the walls of the mansion to be transported into a different realm filled with horrifying creatures and menacing figures. As Thomas unravels the mystery behind the curse, he discovers that he is connected to it in an unexpected way.
2) Craft the item for 16200 gp. When used, transfigure a given material into a finished product. This considers the mention "material component" of this particular spell as meaning "the original material is consumed by the casting" and not "the material component fuels the spell" like bat guano would.
This considers the mention material component of this particular spell as meaning the original material is consumed by the casting and not the material component fuels the spell like bat guano would. This considers the mention material component of this particular spell as meaning the original material is consumed by the casting and not the material component fuels the spell like bat guano would.
As Thomas unravels the mystery behind the curse, he discovers that he is connected to it in an unexpected way. Determined to break free from the curse and save himself and others who have fallen victim to it, Thomas embarks on a dangerous journey to uncover the truth. The trailer for The Curse of Sleeping Beauty showcases a visually stunning and eerie atmosphere, with glimpses of the supernatural and sinister beings lurking in the mansion.
Fabricate through a magic item, material components cost (rules question)
How would you craft and use a magic item able to cast Fabricate?
This question is mostly about material components' cost.
Spell level: 5 (can't be stored in a wand, so I'm thinking about a wondrous item or a rod)
Caster level: 9
Rules for crafting magic item imply that an item able to cast this spell once per day costs 16200 gp: market/base price = spell level x caster level x 1800 / (5/charges per day).
The spell having material components, we check under magic item creation rules and see "If it has some daily limit, determine [additional cost] as if it had 50 charges."
However, the so-called material component is "the original material, which costs the same amount as the raw materials required to craft the item to be created", and the [transfiguration] spell mentions "You convert material of one sort into a product that is of the same material."
Which of the following lines of thought is correct ?
1) Craft the item for 16200 gp + 50 x a given amount. When used, create items whose maximum value is based on the given amount (typically three times that amount). I think this is closer to RAW, but then the user can craft these items for free.
2) Craft the item for 16200 gp. When used, transfigure a given material into a finished product. This considers the mention "material component" of this particular spell as meaning "the original material is consumed by the casting" and not "the material component fuels the spell" like bat guano would.
Louis IX wrote:How would you craft and use a magic item able to cast Fabricate?
This question is mostly about material components' cost.Spell level: 5 (can't be stored in a wand, so I'm thinking about a wondrous item or a rod)
Caster level: 9
Rules for crafting magic item imply that an item able to cast this spell once per day costs 16200 gp: market/base price = spell level x caster level x 1800 / (5/charges per day).The spell having material components, we check under magic item creation rules and see "If it has some daily limit, determine [additional cost] as if it had 50 charges."
However, the so-called material component is "the original material, which costs the same amount as the raw materials required to craft the item to be created", and the [transfiguration] spell mentions "You convert material of one sort into a product that is of the same material."
Which of the following lines of thought is correct ?
1) Craft the item for 16200 gp + 50 x a given amount. When used, create items whose maximum value is based on the given amount (typically three times that amount). I think this is closer to RAW, but then the user can craft these items for free.
2) Craft the item for 16200 gp. When used, transfigure a given material into a finished product. This considers the mention "material component" of this particular spell as meaning "the original material is consumed by the casting" and not "the material component fuels the spell" like bat guano would.
The item you create should probably have a clause that the material component must be presented at the time of using the item, since the material component is effectively in-flux. Otherwise you would basically end up with a magic item that creates stuff out of thin air instead of shaping it (fabricate consumes an item and then produces something made of said item, if you provided all the material components into a magic item ahead of time, then it would just pop out items on demand).
A similar trick is fabricate + eschew materials. Eschew materials can allow you to create 99 pieces of firewood worth of materials or 99 pieces worth of copper worth of materials or about 9.9 pounds of iron worth of stuff from nothing.
Ashiel wrote:The item you create should probably have a clause that the material component must be presented at the time of using the item, since the material component is effectively in-flux. Otherwise you would basically end up with a magic item that creates stuff out of thin air instead of shaping it (fabricate consumes an item and then produces something made of said item, if you provided all the material components into a magic item ahead of time, then it would just pop out items on demand).
A similar trick is fabricate + eschew materials. Eschew materials can allow you to create 99 pieces of firewood worth of materials or 99 pieces worth of copper worth of materials or about 9.9 pounds of iron worth of stuff from nothing.
This is probably the best way. Some spells don't transfer into magic items perfectly without some wonkiness, Fabricate just happens to be one of those spells.
Treat it like a polymorph effect, where the original material is the target, not the material component.
How would you craft and use a magic item able to cast Fabricate?
This question is mostly about material components' cost.
It sets the tone for a suspenseful and thrilling narrative, offering a unique twist on the familiar Sleeping Beauty tale. The film combines elements of horror, fantasy, and mystery, creating a dark and captivating world. The modern reimagining of this classic fairy tale introduces audiences to a different side of the story, filled with suspense and unexpected turns. The Curse of Sleeping Beauty received mixed reviews from critics, with some praising its visual style and unique concept, while others found the narrative to be convoluted. Despite the varied reception, the film stands as an intriguing and ambitious attempt to bring a darker version of Sleeping Beauty to the screen. Overall, The Curse of Sleeping Beauty offers a fresh take on a well-known fairy tale, taking audiences on a suspenseful journey into a world filled with dark magic and ancient curses. Whether one enjoys the twists and turns of the narrative or appreciates the film's visual style, it is undoubtedly a captivating and visually striking experience for fans of fantasy thrillers..
Reviews for "Discover the Dark Origins of the 'Curse of Sleeping Beauty' Trailer"
1. Emily - 1 star - I watched the trailer for "Curse of Sleeping Beauty" and I couldn't help but feel extremely disappointed. The trailer was filled with cliches and predictable jump scares. The acting seemed unconvincing and the story lacked originality. Overall, I found the trailer to be unimpressive and it failed to intrigue me enough to even consider watching the movie.
2. John - 2 stars - The trailer for "Curse of Sleeping Beauty" left me underwhelmed and uninterested. The plot seemed confusing and disjointed, making it difficult to grasp what the movie was actually about. The visuals were lackluster, failing to create any sense of suspense or excitement. In addition, the use of jump scares felt forced and predictable. Overall, the trailer did not do a good job of capturing my attention or making me want to see the movie.
3. Sarah - 2.5 stars - I found the trailer for "Curse of Sleeping Beauty" to be quite generic and uninspiring. It relied too heavily on the tired tropes of the horror genre, including jump scares and creepy dolls. The story seemed unoriginal and lacked any fresh perspective. The visual effects also appeared to be subpar, further decreasing my interest in the film. Overall, the trailer failed to impress me or offer anything new to the horror genre.