Magic, in all its forms, has captivated human beings for centuries. From ancient times to the modern era, people have been fascinated by the idea of harnessing supernatural forces and creating wonders through the power of their own minds. The handiwork of magic is a testament to the innate human desire to understand and control the world around them. The handiwork of magic can be seen in various forms, ranging from simple spells and enchantments to complex rituals and incantations. These magical practices have been passed down through generations, each practitioner adding their own unique techniques and methods to the craft. It is through this handiwork that the secrets of the magical arts are preserved and improved upon.
Water bubble enthusiasts can read his “Bubble Magic” book, in which he explains how to create elegant bubble forms and perform other tricks and activities involving bubbles. But his legacy to the field is undoubtedly not only visually inspiring but also mathematically challenging, providing clues and means for calculations for mathematicians worldwide.
Understanding why bubbles have piqued the curiosity of mathematicians ranging from Isaac Newton to modern-day scientists working with supercomputers has lead Tom to some beautifully abstract thoughts. The yin yang bubble is a double bubble; a smoke bubble inside of a clear bubble and a clear bubble inside of a smoke bubble, it s my most difficult trick to say.
It is through this handiwork that the secrets of the magical arts are preserved and improved upon. One of the most notable examples of the handiwork of magic is seen in the creation of magical objects. Throughout history, wizards and sorcerers have crafted powerful artifacts that possess incredible abilities.
Tom noddy vubble magic
TELEVISION APPEARANCES
USA: The Tonight Show 3 times, Tracy Ullman, Show, That's Incredible, NBC and CBS national news morning shows, noon shows, and evening news shows in over 50 American cities
Germany: mit Rudi Carrell, Knoff Hoff Show
France: avec Sabastien, Jacques Martin
Portugal: Luis de Matos
U.K.: Paul Daniels
THEATER APPEARANCES
Wintergarten, Berlin
Chamaeleon, Berlin
Star Club, Kassel,
Roland Frosch, Muenster
GOP, Hannover
le Cabaret, Monte Carlo, Monaco
International Congress of Mathematics, 1998, Berlin, Germany
Testimonials
"He makes science fun, beautiful fun." - San Francisco Chronicle "You won't believe your eyes."- New York Times "Delightful fellow . exquisite bubbles."- Los Angeles Times "Tom's Bubble Magic presentation was the centerpiece of our first BubbleFest and drew huge and new audiences to our Museum." - Kathleen Conti, Public Programs Manager, Santa Barbara Museum Natural History
SCIENCE
Soap Bubbles are so pure and simple, it's only natural that kids, physisists and mathematicians are their biggest fans. I understand a bit about the "Plateau Problems" and other reasons why bubbles have been of interest to mathematicians from Isaac Newton to present day scientists working with super computers but the truth is that I know more about the physics of bubbles than about the mathematics. In fact, mathematicians fascinate me partly because I do not understand them. The language of math is foreign to me; the written form of the language, equations, is a language written in an unfamiliar alphabet. But hearing mathematicians speak about bubbles has led me to some wonderfully abstract thinking. As Alice said in Through the Looking Glass when she read the nonsense poem Jabberwocky "It seems very pretty but it is rather hard to understand! Somehow it seems to fill my head with ideas--only I don't know what they are!" "My grandfather talked continuously about soap bubbles, and of course in mathematical terms. I did not understand a word of what he said. —Bernhard Caesar Einstein, the grandson of Albert Einstein If you look closely at the suds in the sink the next time you are doing the dishes you'll be tempted, at first, to agree that this is a good example of the chaos of nature. There are so many different shapes to the cells. pyramids, boxes, mulitsided irregular shapes all stuck together. Look closer. Bubble walls always join three walls along an edge at three equal 120° angles. The edges always join four edges at a point, the angle there is always 109° 28' 14". That apparent chaos is, in fact, a network that is demonstrating nature's insistence on minimal forms. Nature is always minimizing but rarely do we see so perfect an example of that tendency as we do when we look at a soap bubble . or a cluster of soap bubbles. Trees branch following these same minimizing principles but trees are complex living structures that are working to balance several conflicting needs: spreading out a leaf to gather sunlight, sending down roots toward moisture, carrying nutrient throughout the large system . Look closely and you will notice that the tree branches always join in three way junctions, so do the roots, so do the veins within the leaves . this is a minimal way of networking and nature always minimizes. The same is true when you look at star clusters or the patterns made by sections of a tortoise shell or the scales on a fish or the packing of grains of sand on a beach . the principles are those of minimal energy . but they are more difficult to discern until you know the many forces at work. In the case of a soap bubble there is really only one force at work . the minimizing effects of surface tension on these nearly weightless fluid forms. The films are, for the most part, thinner than wavelengths of light (!). There is hardly any mass, therefore, hardly any distorting effects of gravity in choosing what shapes are assumed. There is no life force acting to gather nutrition or to spread out in the sun. They are only trying to minimize and they are fluid so they can keep moving until they find THE minimal shapes. A single soap bubble in the air is a nearly perfect sphere. The reason for this is the same reason that planets are spheres, or stars . A single force (gravity for the planet and star, the electrical attractions that appear as surface tension for the bubble) is acting to minimize the form of the object. A sphere is the most economical shape in nature, it uses the least amount of surface area to contain a given volume. If a bubble were any other shape (it is often oval while being blown) it will keep moving until it finds a spherical shape . and once it does, it stops adjusting its shape . it has arrived at the minimal and only there will it stabilize. When two or more bubbles touch they act to share a common wall, thereby saving material for both. But they don't just settle for any arrangement where their edges join. They are fluid, they keep moving until they find the minimal arrangement and that is . three walls along an edge joined at 120°, four edges at a point at 109° 28' 14" . if there were a more economical way to join they would join in that way . there isn't. Bubbles have fascinated physicists and mathematicians for centuries. Sir Isaac Newton made his own bubble formulas, others preceded and followed him in efforts to understand their nature. One of the most useful ways that they have served science is in showing minimal areas when applied tovarious geometric frames. Oddly, there is no good mathematics for solving these very basic questions. If you were to take a ring or hoop and ask what shape would be necessary to fill the space within the round ring . you may intuitively guess at a flat round disc. Any hills or valleys within that disc would cause the form to have extra surface not needed to fill the ring. If you were to dip that ring or hoop into soapy water you would get a film that is a flat round disc. Now, suppose that you bent the ring here and there into some oddly curvy shape (but still closed like a ring). Now what is the minimal shape needed to fill that new wavy ring? We don't know . and there is no mathematics to help you settle the question. This is part of an old mathematics puzzle called the Plateau Problems. Plateau, a Belgian physicists asked questions like these in the 1880s and many of his questions are still unanswered. It is known that if you dip that wavy ring into soapy water you would pick up a film that is the most minimal shape possible . soap films must minimize, they have no choice. An architect named Otto Frei used this principle to design some beautiful buildings using the soap films ability to show him minima. He was therefore able to construct buildings that did not need extra pillars or other help to hold up the walls or ceiling because he knew that he was using the most minimal shapes for the construction of his light weight materials. He knew it was the most minimal because he tested it with soap films . mathematics alone was not enough, he needed the soap bubbles.
Expedition Six
Space Chronicles #8
NASA website article by: ISS Science Officer Don Pettit In early 2003 Science Officer Pettit, an astronaut aboard the International Space Station, prepared to experiment with soap bubbles in space. As you will read in the text, he was distracted from that experiment when he was surprised to find that he could produce a durable film with pure water. This was an unanticipated new bit of science. Water films on the Earth's surface have difficulty forming and are not at all durable. Many (including me) have assumed that this was the result of the pull of the surface tension combined with the ready evaporation of the water when it is unprotected by the layer of soap at the surface. Now we can see that the pull of gravity played an even bigger role in destroying the pure water film whenever it did form (think of the temporary water bubbles that form and collapse when you run water into your sink or bathtub). In zero gravity (0g) that force plays no part and the surprisingly thick water films can deal with the effects of evaporation for a long time (though it does not appear that film formed into pure water bubbles were nearly as long-lasting). It seems as though that nature has a few more surprises up her sleeve and it's a good idea to keep our eyes open even (or especially) when looking at phenomena that we believe we already understand.
KIDS
Upon seeing Bubble Magic in a nightclub or other grown-up venue, people will often exclaim, "oh, but the kids must LOVE this." And, of course, children do love bubbles. But my skill with bubbles is less surprising to them … they hadn't spent so many years assuming that a bubble cube would be impossible. They can imagine bubbles the shape of a donut or bubbles that float straight up or bubbles within bubbles within bubbles or … When grown-ups see these things they seem to be witnessing an overthrow of established laws. The effect is often one that frees their imagination. For kids there is seldom an imagination that is less than free.
Bubble Formulas:
Over the years I have had to change from one formula to another. I developed Bubble Magic using Wonder Bubbles from a company called ChemToy. A larger toy corporation called Strombecker bought up ChemToy and renamed Wonder Bubbles as Mr. Bubbles (not to be confused with Mr. Bubble, the bubble bath product). That was the same good stuff and it was cheap and available for years and years at Woolworth in America. Now Strombecker has gone out of business (so has the American Woolworth). By then I had discovered that I could do my show with Pustefix, a German product from a nice family company (I would modify their excellent bubble solution with dish soap to make it act a bit more like the Mr. Bubbles that I'm use to). Now there is a newer product on the shelves called Gazillion Bubbles that works good so I sometimes use it, sometimes I will use Pustefix and sometimes I'll mix dish soap and water and add a bit of this or that to make it stretch better When mixing at home (usually better for very big bubbles) I will mix some dishwashing liquid with water and maybe add some of the commercial bubble solutions sold in the shops or a little glycerin (sold in drug stores/pharmacies. Try the following mixture of homemade Bubble Juice:
1 part dish soap (I'm having the best luck with blue Dawn nowadays)
16 parts water
8 parts commercial bubble liquid or a MUCH smaller amount of glycerin or corn syrup (start with a teaspoon and mix thoroughly before adding more … don't over do it). Stir it well but try not to make a lot of suds while mixing, if you do, scoop the suds off of the surface. Suds is the enemy of bubble making and having a bucket around to periodically scoop it into will improve the bubble blowing a lot.
Bubble Domes
This is the one bubble activity that I like the best for kids. Bubble domes are very stable and it's a lot easier to manipulate them. Blowing bubbles through a straw allows you to fix the size more carefully . too big? suck some air out of it, not big enough? put the straw in and then a quick suck to break the film within the straw and blow to add more air and increase the size of the bubble. This can be messy but that can be minimized with some care beforehand but in either case, put down a rug or non-slippery mat or just newspapers around the play area. A level table helps and consider creating a rim on the edge of the table (a simple one can be made with duct tape and imagination). I suggest that you put the liquid into a doggie bowl or one of those Tupperware-like tubs that people sometimes use to wash their dishes in . something stable that will not be easily spilled. In either case, don't just hand out jars of liquid to playing children that encourage them to go mobile with the liquid . if you do, and they spill it . well, that wasn't their fault. You'd spill it too if you'd play. You'll need:
* A table
* Plastic drinking straws
* Bubble mix (see above) in a stable container (doggie bowl or dishwashing tub)
* Bubble liquid container. My favorite is a doggy bowl or other stable container for the liquid, not a normal bubble jar.
1.Wet a part of the tabletop
2. Dip the straw deep into the bubble mix
3. Now blow bubble domes onto the wet surface. You can make a long chain of bubbles attached one behind the other (caterpillar), bubble domes within bubble domes (make sure that a lot of the straw is wet, any dry part will break the outer bubble), groups of bubbles together (six bubbles around a center bubble will show you a hexagon, five around will show you a pentagon . ) bubble towers, .
You can't blow an ugly bubble so why not just jump in and give it a try?
Easy to make Big Bubbles
For this you will need:
* Plastic drinking straws
* Cotton string cut to various lengths
* A bucket or tub of the bubble liquid
* Paper towels for drying hands afterwards
1. Thread a length of string (minimum of about 30 inches / 75 centimeters or . about four times the length of the drinking straw) through the two drinking straws
2. Tie the ends of the string into a knot. The straws then become the handles for this simple and excellent bubble-blowing tool.
3. Hold one of the straws in each hand and immerse your hands into Bubble Juice. Keep your fists together as you take them out of the liquid and once you are out in the air with them, spread them apart to expose the large soap film to the air.
4. NOW pull this through the air to produce very big bubbles! * Hint for success: Pull, don't push . if you push, the bubble will emerge directly in front of your body and it'll pop on you.
* Hint for success: Read #3 above again. Pulling the film up out of bucket and perhaps into a wind can be a tricky part of this . the film might snap while emerging. Keeping your hands together will ensure that there is no vulnerable film until you're ready to wave out the bubble
* Hint for success: To close the bubble simply put your hands (therefore, the straws) together again. The film will close off by itself.
* One more hint: When cleaning up afterwards, add some vinegar to the cleaning water. This will destroy the frothing ability of the soapy water and eliminate all the trouble with foam while cleaning.
In 2004, New Scientist asked if it is possible to blow a toroidal soap bubble (one shaped like a ring doughnut) and if it is if it would collapse immediately to a sphere. In the computer simulation produced by John M. Sullivan, professor of mathematics at the University of Illinois, torus bubbles do arise in unstable equilibrium in double soap bubbles wrapped around another bubble in the middle. Tom Noddy responded that he had previously created such a bubble:
These objects are imbued with magical energy and can be used to cast spells, communicate with other realms, or protect the bearer from harm. The handiwork involved in creating these objects requires immense skill, concentration, and understanding of magical principles. The handiwork of magic is not limited to the creation of objects; it also extends to the manipulation of supernatural forces. Witches and wizards use their handiwork to perform spells and rituals, manipulating the elements, summoning spirits, and even altering the fabric of reality itself. The power of their handiwork can be felt in the subtlest of gestures or the most intricate of movements, as they channel their magical energies to achieve their desired effects. But the handiwork of magic is not without its risks. It is a delicate balance between controlling the forces of the supernatural and being consumed by them. Those who dabble in the dark arts often find themselves on a dangerous path, their handiwork becoming twisted and corrupted by the very forces they seek to control. This is why the practice of magic requires discipline, knowledge, and a strong moral compass to ensure that its power is used responsibly and for the benefit of all. In conclusion, the handiwork of magic is a testament to the human fascination with the supernatural. Through spells, enchantments, rituals, and the creation of magical objects, people have sought to understand and harness the forces of the supernatural. However, the handiwork of magic is not without its dangers, requiring practitioners to wield their powers responsibly and with respect for the natural order. The handiwork of magic is a testament to the power of human imagination and the desire to control the world around us..
Reviews for "Runic Inscriptions: Decoding the Ancient Art of Magical Handiwork"
1. Emily - 2 stars - I was really disappointed with "Handiwork of Magic". The plot felt slow and the characters were underdeveloped. It lacked the depth and magic that I was expecting from a fantasy novel. The writing style was also not engaging and failed to capture my attention. Overall, it just didn't live up to the hype for me.
2. James - 1 star - I can't say I enjoyed "Handiwork of Magic" at all. The story felt disjointed and confusing, making it hard to follow what was happening. The author introduced too many unnecessary side characters that didn't add anything to the overall plot. The dialogue was flat and unrealistic, making it difficult to connect with any of the characters. I had high hopes for this book, but unfortunately, it fell flat for me.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - "Handiwork of Magic" was a major letdown for me. The world-building was weak and lacked detail, making it hard to fully immerse myself in the setting. The magic system was not well explained, and I couldn't grasp the rules or limitations of the magical abilities. The pacing of the plot was also off, with long stretches of boredom followed by rushed and confusing action scenes. I had to force myself to finish reading this book, and I would not recommend it to others.